- Headline
- Brutally Honest Review – QCF Is Overhyped, Overworked, and Underdelivering
If you’re considering Georgia Tech’s QCF program, I strongly urge you to think twice—especially if you’re international, career-focused, or hoping for a supportive, high-quality academic experience. This program is not what the brochure promises.
1. Academics: A Mess of Unstructured, Overloaded, and Poorly Taught Courses
The coursework is grueling—not in a good way. You'll get tons of weekly assignments, but learn almost nothing of lasting value. The program is so packed with deliverables that you’ll have no time to prep for interviews, and your GPA will tank, affecting full-time job prospects.
• Derivatives: The professor barely follows any structure. He jumps from topic to topic, provides no slides, and lectures at lightning speed using Excel/Matlab. If you miss one step, you're lost—and there are no materials to review afterward.
• Fixed Income: Professor can't even explain interest rate models clearly. Concepts are skimmed or left ambiguous.
• Stochastic & C++: A disaster. The instructor reads incorrect slides, doesn’t understand what he's teaching, and can't even code C++ himself. Assignments, lectures, and exams feel disconnected.
• Capstone Project with Chava: Pure chaos. If you expect faculty guidance, forget it. The professor forces his own irrelevant research papers on you, offers no project support, and evaluates students arbitrarily.
• AI in Finance: Sounds exciting, but the instructor (again Chava) has no real understanding of machine learning. The class ends up being a buzzword soup.
2. Toxic Culture: Sink or Be Sabotaged
The peer environment is cutthroat and manipulative. Many students are only here to use others for group projects, then turn around and throw teammates under the bus. Trust is nonexistent, and there’s zero faculty support if you’re treated unfairly.
Dr. Chava, the program director, fosters this environment. He rewards students who "worship" him, and punishes anyone who dares to question him. Academic bullying? Gaslighting? Retaliation? It’s all here—and tolerated.
3. Career Outcomes: Way Below Expectation
Let’s be honest. QCF is not a quant feeder program. The best most students get are model validation or product analyst roles. In fact, most job outcomes are either:
• Jobs you could’ve gotten with a bachelor’s degree, or
• No job at all. Roughly 40% of students graduate without full-time offers.
The so-called “job support” is laughable:
• Career platform lists roles that require 4–5 years of experience—useless for new grads.
• Most shared “opportunities” are old public links you could find on LinkedIn or a company's site.
• Resume book occasionally gets you 1–2 interviews per semester, but it’s a lottery.
Worse, many U.S. employers now blacklist QCF students due to previous integrity issues with alumni. The program doesn’t help restore that image—it just ignores it.
4. A Few Bright Spots (That No Longer Exist)
Once upon a time, there were great professors—like in Financial Optimization or Data Mining—who genuinely cared and taught well. But they’ve either left the program or stopped teaching.
Conclusion
QCF at Georgia Tech is not worth your time or money unless you already have experience, a green card, and want to validate an existing resume. For everyone else, it’s a high-stress, low-reward grind with little academic depth and even less career payoff.
If you want to suffer under a broken system run like a personal fiefdom, come meet Chava. Otherwise, run.
- Recommend
- No, I would not recommend this program
- Students Quality
-
1.00 star(s)
- Courses/Instructors
-
1.00 star(s)
- Career Services
-
1.00 star(s)
