• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!

Former Goldman quant spills secret

Joined
5/2/06
Messages
11,768
Points
273
Antony worked as pricing quant at Goldman Sachs from 2005-2008 and now works in a 3-person start up in Silicon Valley.
I chatted yesterday with Antony and he is anxious at the moment about being sued by GS for what he said in the article.
I joined Goldman Sachs in 2005, after five flailing years in a physics Ph.D. program at Berkeley.

The average salary at Goldman Sachs in 2005 was $521,000, and that’s counting each and every trader, salesperson, investment banker, secretary, mail boy, shoe shine, and window cleaner on the payroll. In 2006, it was more like $633,000.

In the summer of 2005, I took one look at my offer letter and the Goldman Sachs logo above it, another look at my sordid grad student pad, and I got on a plane to New York within the week. I packed my copy of Liar’s Poker for reference.

My job on arrival? I was a pricing quant on the Goldman Sachs corporate credit trading desk1. We traded credit-default swaps, both distressed and investment-grade credit, and in the bizarre trading experiment assigned to me, the equity part of the corporate capital structure as well.

There were other characters in this drama. The sales guys were complete tools, with a total IQ, summing over all of them, still safely in the double digits. The traders were crafty and quick-witted, but technically unsophisticated and with the attention span of an ADHD kid hopped up on meth and Jolly Ranchers. And the quants (strategists in Goldman speak)? Mostly failed scientists (like me) who had sold out to the man and suddenly found themselves, after making it through two years of graduate quantum mechanics, with a bat-wielding gorilla peering over their shoulder (that would be the trader) asking them where their risk report was.

At the risk of getting sued, let me throw you geeks a bone and part the Goldman veil a bit. The Goldman Sachs risk system is called SecDB (securities database), and everything at Goldman that matters is run out of it. The GUI itself looks like a settings screen from DOS 3.0, but no one cares about UI cosmetics on the Street. The language itself was called SLANG (securities language) and was a Python/Perl like thing, with OOP and the ORM layer baked in. Database replication was near-instant, and pushing to production was two keystrokes. You pushed, and London and Tokyo saw the change as fast as your neighbor on the desk did (and yes, if you fucked things up, you got 4AM phone calls from some British dude telling you to fix it). Regtests ran nightly, and no one could trade a model without thorough testing (that might sound like standard practice, but you have no idea how primitive the development culture is on the Street). The whole thing was so good, I didn’t even know what an ORM really was until I started using Rails and had to wrestle with ActiveRecord. The codebase was roughly 15MM lines when I left, and growing. I suspect my retinas are still scarred by the weird color blue SecDB was by default.

Why founding a three-person startup with zero revenue is better than working for Goldman Sachs. | AdGrok
 
This is absolutely brilliant stuff:

"The fluffers on the porn set of high finance."

Hmmph. Looks like he chickened out and removed the above sentence -- arguably the most memorable one in his essay. It can still be seen at the Huffington Post link provided by Andy. The definition of a quant should now be:

"Fluff girls on the porn set of high finance."
 
I recently had a chance to speak to a quant at he confirmed that things do get crazy on the street. He mention to me and a couple of other people that before things started to get bad for a joke he started to keep a journal and little items from his past. I asked jokingly why does he feel the need to do such a thing and he told me with a straightest face, " This is like my breadcrumb trail back to sanity"

I was under the impression quants were seen a GODs, is this not true? As a person on the outside looking in, I can only ask, with the money, and the endless opportunities who wouldn't want that life. I would sell my soul to be as smart as some of these people and do the things they do. Instead I'm the one trying to break-in. I think its funny how that works.
 
I was under the impression quants were seen a GODs, is this not true? As a person on the outside looking in, I can only ask, with the money, and the endless opportunities who wouldn't want that life. I would sell my soul to be as smart as some of these people and do the things they do. Instead I'm the one trying to break-in. I think its funny how that works.
That's naive. We are just people like you. There are no common agreement as to how you will define a "quant". Like employees of most industry, the common goal is to make money.
There is absolutely no reason to put the "quants" on a pedestal and trust every single thing they or the models say. Learn to be skeptical of everything you hear, read. Everything.
Everyone has a sale to make, an agenda to push. Once you got past this realization, you may live to enjoy what you do.
 
Back
Top