• C++ Programming for Financial Engineering
    Highly recommended by thousands of MFE students. Covers essential C++ topics with applications to financial engineering. Learn more Join!
    Python for Finance with Intro to Data Science
    Gain practical understanding of Python to read, understand, and write professional Python code for your first day on the job. Learn more Join!
    An Intuition-Based Options Primer for FE
    Ideal for entry level positions interviews and graduate studies, specializing in options trading arbitrage and options valuation models. Learn more Join!

Baruch MFE Baruch's Pre-MFE Reviews anyone?

In order to be successful in any of the Pre-MFE seminars, you must have taken the corresponding undergraduate course. The seminars will help you review the material, as well as go deeper in certain areas, all in the context of practical financial applications.
 
I have those videos at home. I won't be watching them soon. I have other things to do, study for GMAT, review linear Algebra and Probability. Those videos have gotten good reviews on amazon. Another good site is http://www.khanacademy.org/
I used that website for algebra review. He does make a lot of mistakes in Linear Algebra though :( He does review precalculus and Calculus too. It's free.
 
Any final thoughts on the Calculus seminar? How was the final exam? Did more people drop out?
 
I was wondering if someone could give some more detail? For example, did the course go to0 fast? Was the professor or TAs great? Was he or she accessible outside of class? Was the exams hard? Homework hard? Was it worth the money to spend to try to get into an MFE program? Is there any preparation you would do before taking those seminars? Thanks.

Purplyboy,

I took this seminar, and I have a very good experience.
The course was moving fast, but everything is fair and straightforward - I mean, you have the material that you need to study: Lectures, a book, a solutions manual, 2 TA-s, a forum for students, also we formed a study group. Professor Stefanica and the TA-s are very dedicated, and provide all the help.
There are 3 "subjects": calculus, finance, and programming, so you need to spend a considerable amount of time to study, and do the homework. If you could also do the excercises at the and of each chapter, that is even better (and the solution is provided). If you do all the homework, and understand them, you are well prepared for the final.

Definitely you need to prepare for the course in advance. The first chapter of the book has basic calculus (differentiation, integration, limit, etc), but I went through my old calculus books, and did some excercises for practice. I took calculus 10 years ago, but it came back after reviewing the material. I had a classmate, who told me, that he was preparing for this class for months, because he even had to review the pre-calculus before the calculus. (If you don't do math for a while, you could forget some of it. However, it seems he did well in the class. So, I guess, the preparation for the calculus, depends on your situation.)

You can program on any language, or even you can setup the formulas on Excel sheet (although, I'm not sure how it would work out for more difficult programming assignments.) My suggestion is to decide before the course what language you want to program in, and get the compile on your computer, plus you do some basic practice - this way you don't have to spend time on this during the course. (There is no lecture on programming, but the TA-s can help you with your codes.)

Out of the "3 subjects", probably you would struggle with 1 or 2, that you need to spend more time on it. I think, the key word of the course is the "time". If you spend considerable amount of time, you will succeed. While taking this (or these) seminar, try to put aside those things of your life, that you can, and focus on this.
We were recommended by a current MFE student, who took this seminar a year prior, to spend 15-20 hours. (This is what he did, but again, it depends on your background.)

By taking this course:
- Definitely helps you prepare for the MFE "technical interview" (for calculus, but I assume the same thing is true for the lin. alg. and prob. classes). Additional benefit, if you apply to Baruch, upon completion, a recommendation is given (so that covers you for 1 of the 3 recommendation letters).
- Helps you to decide whether you want to do an MFE program, and pursue a career in quant. It gives you a taste, how the MFE classes look like, and gives a sense what you are expected at a quant job. Both TA-s held a job in the finance industry, so they were able to give us "first-hand" advice
- Deepen your knowledge in the math background of financial concepts. In the class, there were finance professionals, whose goal was precisely this (and not to apply to an MFE program).
- You get to solve mathematical problems, those that are probably new to you, because all math problems are related to financial applications. (If you're interested in math, you would appreciate this.)

In addition:
- You wold get "real life" tips on quant job interview questions. (many times, it was pointed out, that this and that question was asked from a prospective applicant)
- Get to know other people, from different background, who are interested in this area
- Get "fun facts" - like the story of Ed Thorp, who developed mathematical methods to win in the Las Vegas casinos (his book is "Beat the Dealer"), and was also a hedge fund manager - I think this is a fascinating reading.

You asked about "dropouts" - unfortunately I was one of them. But I definitely don't have any regrets taking this course - I still think it is worth the time and money.
I dropped out for very personal reasons:
A full time job, 3 kids, and a graduate level "contemporary accounting course" at Baruch (I'm doing masters in accounting), and timing of the course. Because all of these, I was not able to spend enough time on this seminar, especially in December. There were so many assignments in my accounting class (readings, group project, paper, etc.), that I could not keep up with both classes, and with the other responsibilities. The finals were 2 days apart. I think, I could have finished this seminar successfully, if it were scheduled earlier.
Also, this seminar made me realize, that I won't be able to spend the required time to successfully finish an MFE program, and compete with other job applicants. I cannot leave my job and my family. If I were out of job, probably, I would do an MFE (even with kids).

So, I would recommend this course - in either case: If you're undecided, or if you are definitely sure, you want to apply, but you need a "boot camp" for the technical interview. (Plus, I think, for Baruch, the recommendations would really help you for getting selected for an interview.)

I'm very glad that I get to know "this world", and these people. It is interesting to watch how the future shapes.
 
Thanks for the long reply. Georgina, a little off topic. How's the masters in Accounting? Do a lot of the people in the program get internships or jobs? I'm looking for an insiders view. I was thinking about applying to it or the Masters in Quantitative Methods. My feeling is that its probably easier to find a job in Accounting than Quantitative Methods. I hope you did not take a full course load with the Calculus Seminar. I guess a recommendation is given only if you pass?
 
Thanks for the long reply. Georgina, a little off topic. How's the masters in Accounting? Do a lot of the people in the program get internships or jobs? I'm looking for an insiders view. I was thinking about applying to it or the Masters in Quantitative Methods. My feeling is that its probably easier to find a job in Accounting than Quantitative Methods. I hope you did not take a full course load with the Calculus Seminar. I guess a recommendation is given only if you pass?

Purplyboy,

Some accounting classes are difficult at Baruch, but not because of the material (I think the MFE is much more difficult), but because it is lots of materials and some classes are very vague - you don't know how to prepare for the exam. (At one of my acct classes, the final was totally different from what we did in the review class.) In this sense, the calculus seminar was refreshing to me, because everything is straightforward, and you know what to study.
The best thing is to look up the reviews about the professors at ratemyprofessors.com website, and choose the one, where you can learn / possible to get good grades. (This is true for every class, at every college.) I don't know too many people because I just take 1 class / semester. Some already has a job, some international students, etc. I don't know how the job search goes - but I think, currently acctg is one of the best area for employment (because there are so many new rules and regulations).

I just took 1 acctg class, and the seminar (Nov-Dec), but it was more than enough for me, because I have a full time job, and a family, and both classes required lots of work. First, I was thinking to do the seminar next year, when I'm done with acctg, but I was afraid that too many people would apply - since this is going to be the 3rd year. Now the pre-seminars are offered for the 2nd time, and maybe not that many people know about it.

Why do you want to apply to Masters in Qualitative Methods, and not into MFE? You can take the lin. algebra and probability seminars in the Spring (if there is still space), and the calculus in 2012 Fall, and apply for MFE for 2013. If you need to prepare for the calculus seminar, you can do it during the summer.

I think recommendation is given, if you pass the seminar. The passing score is 70, and it is not difficult to achieve, if you put the required time. If you don't pass, probably you won't be able to pass the MFE interview either. Homework is 50%, Final is 50%. I got over 70 for each homework I submitted (people I knew in the seminar, got over 90 on the homeworks). If you do all the homework, it means that you understand the material - and this is what will be asked on the Final. It is open book/notes, so you don't need to memorize. But obviously, you cannot do it within 2 or 3 hours, if this is the first time you see the problem, and have not done it before. My only problem was really the timing, the acctg and this final was 2 days apart, and besides preparing for the acctg final, we had too submit all the projects (lots of reading/writing, group presentation, etc).
 
Thanks again. I wanted to apply for an MS as a Safety measure. I'm not sure I will be accepted into the MFE program with the acceptance rates being 6%. If I apply I can get into an MS in Fall 2012 and then maybe try to apply for MFE Fall of 2013. I spoke to a person in the Quantitative Methods program he told me that internships are few and that most people already have a job while taking it.
 
Thanks again. I wanted to apply for an MS as a Safety measure. I'm not sure I will be accepted into the MFE program with the acceptance rates being 6%. If I apply I can get into an MS in Fall 2012 and then maybe try to apply for MFE Fall of 2013. I spoke to a person in the Quantitative Methods program he told me that internships are few and that most people already have a job while taking it.

Purplyboy,

The acceptance rate is only 6% - however, it is doable to get admitted. They state that they don't have a set number of seats - every qualified applicants are accepted. Also, there might be some people who apply, even though they don't have the pre-requisites - so their applications are immediately denied. Although the admission committee does not have a set number for GRE and GPA, I suspect that very few people would be admitted below GRE Q - 750, and below 3.0 GPA. (Unless something else is very exceptional).

Basically, you need to get the maximum GRE - Q (800 in the old system, I'm not sure about the new system). Try to get high score on the verbal and essay parts of the GRE as well. (If needed, retake the GRE.) Statement letter - you can write a good one, work with a professional writer for editing. Undergrad GPA - you cannot control this one, hopefully you have a high one.
The Baruch MFE's website says that 13 out 30 MFE students completed the seminars successfully - I think it means, that if you complete the pre-MFE seminar(s) succesfully, you have a very good chance to get admitted. It looks to me, that everyone in the pre-MFE seminar(s), who really want to get admitted to MFE, they will. (In the seminar(s) there are always people who simply just want to expand their knowledge, or people like me, who - after seeing what it takes -, just don't want to do this.)
 
Without giving out too much info about myself, I don't fit those requirements. Although I haven't taken the GMAT yet, I will. Looking at the statistics, they rejected 629 applicants last year and accepted only 43. I just didn't want to put all my hopes on this little chance. I don't know how to program in C++ even. I will take their Pre-MFE and see what happens. I had some problems understanding the textbooks, but I'm self learning on some videos now. Hopefully, I can be up to par or the professor will go over the material better in the seminar.
 
Also, there's a question of what they mean by qualified. There's a lot of what ifs. Looking at earlier year admit statistics it was much easier to get in at 2006 then now. I'm not sure if they'll admit someone if they took all there Pre-MFE seminars and C++ online course and pass them, but doesn't have a high gpa or high gmat score. Thats still a big unknown. Obviously Baruch can make more money if they admit more students, but they don't. They obviously want to take the best candidates and keep standards high. I think the avg class size is about 24-30. Although it was 40 in 2008. I guess if I decided to apply for an MFE, I would apply to other lower ranking programs like NYU-Poly.
 
I guess if I decided to apply for an MFE, I would apply to other lower ranking programs like NYU-Poly.

No! If you want to get into Baruch, apply to Baruch. If you want to get into Columbia, apply to Columbia. You should not let self-doubt and grades let you down. If someone is passionate about something they should not give up so easy! Network like nuts and find very influential people to write your reference letters. Code hard and study harder. Then apply to the schools you WANT to get into, not the ones you "think" you might get into!
 
I will take their Pre-MFE and see what happens. I had some problems understanding the textbooks, but I'm self learning on some videos now. Hopefully, I can be up to par or the professor will go over the material better in the seminar.
Which Pre-MFE are you registered for? I am also going through self-learning videos, but not textbooks (due to bad reviews). It's quite difficult to get up to speed, but the challenge is what motivates me. When the seminar begins, I'm sure we can get a study group going to learn from each other. Perhaps, during the seminar, you would find out whether an MFE program is for you.
 
I watched the linear algebra videos on Khan academy, but they were long (20 minutes) and some of them are very boring, unlike his other videos. I watched most of them. I watched the first 2 videos on Opencourseware by Strang also. I don't like his (Strang's) teaching style that much, because he assumes you know a lot of things. I bought this (The Matrix Algebra Tutor by Jason Gibson) and watched it for review. Jason doesn't go over all the material like vectors and graphing and eigenvectors and stuff. If I were starting over, I would watch Jason Gibson's video first. It gives a different perspective than Khan Academy. I watched all the Probability Videos on Khan Academy. They were easy to understand. I also bought the Probability and Statistics video by Jason Gibson , but haven't watched it yet. I'm probably going to watch Strang's video's after finishing Jason's videos since Strang's book is used in the seminar. The Jason Gibson videos are very easy to understand. I watched part of his calculus 1&2 videos. However, he doesn't cover everything, because most of his videos are 7-10 hours long. Most classroom classes are much longer than that. He does have like 5 other calculus videos if you are looking to brush up on calculus for next year.
 
Lecture 19, at around 24:40 there's a guy in a costume walking in front of the room with a Grim Reaper axe like costume :D
 
Back
Top